Skip to main content

About Osama's Death and Implications for Indo-Pak

Will Pakistan ever be able to ask for a treatment as equals with India after surrendering its sovereignty in wide public galore, in the aftermath of Osama shoot-outs in Pakistan? True, US had entered Afghanistan  in a similar fashion, but it was essentially not a nation, rather a piece of land under the control of some rogue group of people from different origins, not sharing any cultural and historical bonds (except religious, of course). 
But Pakistan, notwithstanding, curios acrobats in International diplomacy by their senior leadership, still carried a semblance of a nation. India and Pakistan share a common history and for some reason, primarily the keen interest of a large population in maintaining stability has ensured that the idea of nation survived even in the face of most cruel leaders and most insensitive governance (While we all praise the palaces and architecture of old kingdoms, is it not surprising that the distribution of wealth was so anomalous that the villages surrounding those magnificent forts were such ramshackle). Religion always played the stabilizing role in the region, giving people hope in the most desperate situations and therefore, even people like Mughals who in their own native lands were nomadic warriors, found themselves setting up empires. 
It is from this same idea of stable nation that the twin nations of India and Pakistan had emerged. 
 Somewhere, religion which was used earlier as binding force for the larger populace of a nation, was used as a force to keep people away from ambition and confine power to traditionally rich and aristocratic families in Pakistan. The confinement eventually ensured that the circle of governing class did not expand and evolve to include competent people from other than non-ruling elite. The incompetence offered limited options for governance, and the failure was hidden from public scrutiny using religion as what Marx had claimed- the opium of masses. A general interface with Pakistani masses will show the dogmatic manner in which they tow the government line, shows how the taming of intellect with religious fundamentalism is complete. The people there do not find anything odd in the way a multi-cultural society has given way to a monolithic society with minority religion limited to a mere sub- ten percent. 
Having done a near absolute cleansing, leaders in Pakistan wanted to keep people busy fighting some enemy to keep them off from the larger questions like lack of scientific education, a bankrupt economy etc. With the minority cleanup near complete, no enemy inside was in sight so initially it was Soviets and then it is India, US and Israel. 
While it may seem incomprehensible to the votaries of Aman ki Aasha, usually pre-partition punjabis, living in the nostalgic memories of streets of lahore, the situation is hopeless for the nation, in which half the citizens do not consider that they belong to the nation, but rather to an imaginary religious nationhood, intelligence gathered is passed on to another nation for them to take action, descendants of Mongols are now guarding Siachin and buiding dams etc. It is utterly hopeless, but then the common man on the street have the ability to suddenly wake up and spring a surprise as JP and Anna movement in India,  developments in Egypt, Syria and Libya shows. Hope the average person in Pakistan feels so bitterly betrayed that it seeks an engineer or doctor from non-feudal family to rule the country. That is only hope for India to have a safe world in the neighborhood.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Great Shake in Governance- New Modi Cabinet- My Take

This week, the Narendra Modi government was expanded. However, as it turned out, it was not merely an expansion, rather complete rehash of the cabinet, with many faces, widely believed as non-performers eased out of their positions.  The expansion came with the dropping of some key names, much famed and widely seen on TV Channels, perceived to me closest to the leftist media houses. Prakash Javadekar was shunted, Ravishankar Prasad was dropped, so was Ramesh Pokhariyan Nishank. Apart from the worthies of Ministries of Information & Broadcasting, Law and IT and HRD, Dr. Harshvardhan was also dropped from health.  Before we look at the addition, it is pertinent to look at the deletions from the earlier Cabinet. Prakash Javadekar, as I&B Minister was expected to take strong stand, make statements, blast the inane propaganda in key policy initiatives that the Modi Government was taking. From Land Acquisition Bill to Demonetization to GST to Triple Talaq to CAA to Farmer's Bill-

दो जोड़ी नन्ही आँखें

अनदेखे ख़्वाबों की दो जोड़ी नन्हीआँखें, जिन्होंने स्वप्न देखने की आयु से पूर्व दु:स्वप्न देख आँखें मूँद लीं। जो क़दम अभी चलना ही सीखे थे, लड़खड़ा कर थम गए। बचपन के घुटने पर लगी हर खरोंच, व्यस्कों के गाल पर एक तमाचा है। धर्म के आडंबरों से अछूता बाल मन जो मंदिरों और मस्जिदों को अपनी आत्मा में रखता था, धर्म की दरारों पर अपना नन्हा शव छोड़ निकल पड़ा। कहीं दूर,दग्ध शरीर के ताप से दूर, जब यह अकलुषित हृदय पहुँचा तो एक और निष्पाप दूधिया आत्मा दिखी, जिसकी पलकों के कोरों में उसकी आँखों के जैसे ही अविश्वास से सहमा हुआ अश्रु रूका था। एक दूसरे के गले लग कर दोनों बाल मन दरिया के टूटे बाँध की तरह बह निकले। घाव बाँटे, एक दूसरे के हृदय में चुभी धरती की किरचें निकाली और न देखे हुए स्वप्नों का श्राद्ध रचा। उसने थमती हिचकियों में अपना नाम बताया - ‘आसिफा’। और दुख के साथी की ठोड़ी थाम कर कहा - ‘मत रो, न्याय होगा।’ धरती की तरफ़ नन्ही गुलाबी उँगली दिखा कर कहा- “देख, भले लोग लड़ रहे है मेरे लिए, न्याय होगा। तेरे लिये भी लड़ रहे होंगे। तू मत रो” फिर बोली, “मैं पश्चिम से हूँ, तू पूरब से, पर हैं

Truth and Narrative- New York Times fresh Salvo and interest in Love Jihad

For last week or so, New York Times has been desperately seeking first hand account of those who were in Inter-faith relations in India. A news medium is usually supposed to pursue the news, not create them. In this case, NYT first made up its mind that it needs to write on Inter-faith marriages in India and somehow create a narrative how poor and innocent Muslim men are falling prey to the belligerent, bigoted Hindus who are not allowing their women live with those they love. Having decided the line of argument, they set about creating the articles and two initial Essays have come up- Are You in an Interfaith Relationship in India? and another How New Laws Across India are Seeking to Ban All Interfaith Marriages ,  both published on the same day, linked to one another.  As they had put the cart before the horses, it is no wonder that the carriage tumbled the moment it started moving. Incidentally, it seems those who run things at New York Times that a spate of articles, suddenly comi