Skip to main content

No, Prime Minister

Last week was a rare occasion when the Prime Minister of the world's most populous democracy decided to speak to his people, fourth time in seven years since he took to power. The fact that he has spoken to the people so few a time is in itself a saddening fact, leaving apart the manner in which he spoke to the people, In Camera, and to a select chosen few.
It smelled clearly of more of a PR exercise than of a genuine desire of establishing communication with estranged nation bewildered at every day disclosures of newer scams of humongous proportions, supplemented by sheer show of arrogance, with an air of almost near total impunity. The pattern was very clear, scams were all very large in size, will carry on in spite of public uproar for a long spell of time, long enough to loot and hide the wrongly acquired wealth, with spokesperson of ruling fraternity coming on television camera to deny any wrong doing, till the time an unyielding court decide to intervene and then, under pressure of court government acting and same people again coming on the television camera, claiming the credit for the action which they were forced to take contrary to their earlier public posturing.
Prime Minister, who has been credited with being the first apolitical prime minister of the country, basking in the after-glory of the liberalization which was forced on the country on account of near-bankruptcy of failed governance given by the party which he now represents, has failed to reign in inflation. Now he says he has no  magic wand. But then this people already knew, O learned one, did thou not know it when thou promised us with deadlines for inflation coming out twice. When he came out and made statement of CVC appointment, he claimed it was DOPT responsible, why can't CEO of Satyam claim that his CFO was responsible for all the mess?
His team got into act a day before the meeting of the PM with editors and they came on camera, in team. One spokesperson said, Prime Minister will decide when he wants to speak and what he wants to speak when questioned about rarity of his Public interfaces, other spokesperson was even funnier, when he decided to speak tangential to the questions asked stating that he will not be browbeaten to answer the new anchor's question, I was wondering if he will start singing some song next since he had decided that he will speak only what he pleased to speak about (thankfully, he didn't).
So the spokesperson says PM will speak to the nation when he wants to (four times in seven years) and the way he wants to and what he wants to (he may decided to even talk about giving cookery lessons, even when his ministers are spending retirements in the Jail on account of court actions). Then the PM says he meets the Congress president every week, thus making it clear, that contrary to what founding fathers of nation thought, he reports routinely to the person who actually made him the PM, not to the common masses who think they made him the PM. His mild manners disappears when he tells judiciary to stay within limits or CAG to stick to its limits.
He speaks to the nation and tells he was not aware of CWG bungling and the matters raised by ManiShankar Aiyar were merely ideological. Was he living in a different country then, do they not get newspapers in PMO and 10, Janpath and are they not watching News channels there? Thus the poor PM, bereft of any other mode of intelligence gathering, (possibly busy in collecting information about people who have recently caused them trouble, look around, the moment you are significant enough to cause significant trouble to significant few, skeletons start trembling out, ask Ramdev, Lalit Modi), was solely dependent on his minister to alarm him, who alas, provided, only ideological insights and therefore, the PM did nothing. It would be wrong to dismiss the PM as political novice, he understands it well when he says no one wants a mid-term election. One has to be blind to notice the temerity and tepidness with which the main opposition approaches the issue. Mani Shankar Aiyar comes out as the only main with clear sight and straight spine who speaks the truth. I would have loved to join a party in case this man decided to float it, alas, this is not to happen. He comes out to be too wise and too upright a man to be the prime minister in this country, such honesty makes one completely useless to people around. It still warms my heart to find that there are still men like Mr. Aiyar around.
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man- James Joyce- Book Review

Amazon Link 
Some books are an act of education; they cannot be read in haste, cannot be understood in one read. James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man gives one such feeling.
It is a coming of age story of Stephen Dedalus. Nothing extraordinary about that. But then there a rich, slowly flowing lost river of philosophy which moves beneath the surface, turning an ordinary story of a boy growing up, encountering questions about faith, religion and sex, into an exceptional, extraordinary and engaging story. The story moves along the timeline, much in the manner of Virginia Woolf’s To the Lighthouse, where the writer is seemingly a passive narrator. Further, while this book is more of a philosophical essay wrapped around a story, Ms. Woolf’s book, on the other hand, is rather a Story primarily, with a philosophical touch. This book is blatantly philosophical, dwelling into the dangerous territory of religion and how a growing mind looks at God. It begins with his school, whe…

Bahubali 2- The Conclusion- Movie Review

We are living in an extremely cause-heavy world where causes - real and imagined cloud our minds. I saw this in the case of the movie - Beauty and The Beast. There the quarrel of the social commentators was that it explored the gay angle of one of the characters only briefly, only fleetingly. There can be nothing more absurd than that. You are demanding more from an artist than possibly he can offer. Art is a profession of lonely persuasion, and it serves the purpose its creator desires it to serve. Nothing more and nothing less. It is sad and unfortunates that the liberals, which in Indian context largely translates to Leftists, insists that art is nothing but a vehicle that should be provided to them for their political agendas and narratives to ride on. It is like insisting that the reference to the Negroes in the "The Great Gatsby" should have been expanded to cover racism in detail. The brief episode was merely to substantiate the character and nothing more. Just as cre…

Resurrecting Hinduism- Without Embarrassment

I have been pondering about the sense of despondency, the sense of shame which has been imposed on the Hindu thoughts in Indian society. Every act of faith has to be explained, justified. When partition happened, Muslims fought and obtained an independent Nation, while the other large chunk of population, which, in spite of numerical supremacy, was subjugated for centuries, got India. In line with inherent openness and flexibility of Hinduism, India became a secular nation. This is a matter of pride, since it acknowledged the basic secular nature of Sanatan Dharm. However, as things would evolve, vested political interests considered India as unfinished agenda standing in the path of a religious empire being built world-wide. Through a well-calculated intellectual conspiracy of neglect and vilification, it came to a stage that modern Hindus where embarrassed of their religion and apologetic of their faith. This neglect also resulted in the religion being left to the guardianship of un…