Vande Mataram is the outrage of the
day. Unfortunately, this happens on the day which marks the death anniversary
of great writer and revolutionist, Shri Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyaya. We have
come to a decisive state in the life of our nation. A nation which gained
independence in 1947, and struggled to get on its feet for seventy odd years,
scraping through periods of emergency, has come on its own. There comes a time
in the life of its nation, where it stands up on its feet and asserts itself. A
nation is not a piece of land, nor is it about its building. Nation is an idea,
always an idea. Secure minds create an idea of nation which is unapologetic,
independent, guiltless, proud and assertive. Such an idea is always open and
stands above the ideology. Insecure minds imprison that Idea. Then they try to tell you as a nation how you should behave. That is my problem with forty second amendment to
the Constitution, which was sneaked in by Congress leader and then Prime Minister of India, Mrs Indira Gandhi. Socialism is an ideology and when you include it in the
definition of a nation, you are compromising on the idea of the nation. But
then that is how politics has been in India. This was done when the same idea was absolutely rejected by Dr. BR Ambedkar at the time of framing of the constitution. It is absolutely interesting that the Congress which trampled over the spirit of constitution (when pushed to include socialism in constitution by Mr. KT Shah, Ambedkar termed it- destroying democracy altogether; not surprising, 42nd amendment came in the middle of Emergency) keeps going back to Constitution all the time.
The intellectual elite feeling overwhelmed by the native, Hindi speaking
Indian negating all their advises in UP do not even understand when they stop
opposing Modi and start opposing a nation. What could be sorrier than the fact
that the Death anniversary of Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay is celebrated not
with twitter hashtag #VandeMataram, rather media channels are celebrating it
with #VandeMataramRow.
The out-of-power Congress opposes the
imposition of Vande Mataram and make confusing noises, somehow equating it with
the idea of Hindu Rashtra which belongs more to RSS than to BJP, and call it
Anti-Muslim. Let us look at the journey of this song.
Vande Mataram was a song which first
appeared in the novel of Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay, Anandmath which was based on Sanyasi
movement. It is believed that he wrote the song in 1870, but it became
popular with AnandMath in the year
1880. While the song was originally written as a prayer to Goddess Durga, the
words came about to define Mother India and soon became the rallying cry for
the freedom-fighters across India. The words Vande Mataram literally mean “I bow to thee, O Mother.”
It was first sung in Congress Convention
in 1896 by Rabindra Nath Tagore. Both, Anandmath,
the book and the Song were banned by the British, but many went to jail
singing Vande Mataram. It would be
amusing if it were not be so saddening that today not singing the same song
which illustrates the glory of motherland becomes a symbol of emancipation. While
the later paragraphs of the song did mention Goddess Durga, the first two
paragraphs, in spirit and meaning both spelt nation. Let us look at the words-
वन्दे मातरम्
सुजलां सुफलाम्
मलयजशीतलाम्
सस्यशामलाम्
मातरम्।
शुभ्रज्योत्स्नापुलकितयामिनीम्
शुभ्रज्योत्स्नापुलकितयामिनीम्
फुल्लकुसुमितद्रुमदलशोभिनीम्
सुहासिनीं सुमधुर भाषिणीम्
सुखदां वरदां मातरम्।। १।। वन्दे मातरम्।
(Translation by Sri Aurobindo Ghosh
Mother, I bow to thee!
Rich with thy hurrying streams,
bright with orchard gleams,
Cool with thy winds of delight,
Dark fields waving Mother of might,
Mother free.
Glory of moonlight dreams,
Over thy branches and lordly streams,
Clad in thy blossoming trees,
Mother, giver of ease
Laughing low and sweet!
Mother I kiss thy feet,
Speaker sweet and low!
Mother, to thee I bow.
Rich with thy hurrying streams,
bright with orchard gleams,
Cool with thy winds of delight,
Dark fields waving Mother of might,
Mother free.
Glory of moonlight dreams,
Over thy branches and lordly streams,
Clad in thy blossoming trees,
Mother, giver of ease
Laughing low and sweet!
Mother I kiss thy feet,
Speaker sweet and low!
Mother, to thee I bow.
The words and description clearly bring home the point
that the poet refers to the land as the mother. When one talks about the riches
of nature, one definitively talks of the land, the motherland. The references
to Durga in subsequent verses can be traced to the story of Anandmath wherein
the nation is mentioned in three forms, Jagaddhatri
– the benevolent, all-giving mother (which it was), Kali - The incarnation of
death, the taker of lives (Which it has become) and Durga- the warrior Goddess, which it must become to escape the dark
age of colonial history. The poet is not a priest, as we see, and has not
written it as a religious tome. For him, Goddesses are stages in the life of
the nation. Still, in consideration of the hyper-sensitive feelings of bigoted
Muslims, Constituent assembly decided to take initial two verses which had no
reference to Durga as a National Song.
Little they could see the future India wherein the
fanaticism will reach its peak and appeasement will reach the lowest point of
national morality. There are attempts being made to prove that Vande Mataram as national song is some
way subservient to the National Anthem Jan
Gan Man. We must however remember what was said in the Constituent assembly
on 24th of January, 1950, when the two songs of our freedom struggle
were dedicated to the nation. Here is how the two songs were given to the
freshly formed nation-
The composition consisting
of the words and music known Jana Gana Mana is the national anthem, subject to
such alteration in the words as the Government may authorize as the occasion arises;
the song Vande Mataram, which has played a historic part in the struggle for
Indian Freedom, shall be honored equally
with Jana Gana Mana and shall have equal status.
It is therefore unfair on the part of the people and the
liberal elites to try to belittle the song as any other song. SP spokesperson
on the TV debate mentioned that Tagore was opposed to the song, which I have
mentioned as incorrect, since he was first to sing the song in Congress
convention in 1896. It was later sung in subsequent congress sessions in 1901
and 1905. I also dispute his contention of terming it as any other song,
equating it with “Sare Jahaan se Achha” adding
that he is son of an IAF personnel and has sung that song only in schools. I
dispute it as the son of IAF personnel (though it has nothing to do with
nationalism or patriotism of an individual, but since he said it, I too shall
say it), since Vande Mataram is always sung at end of events in Kendriya
Vidyalaya where most defense personnel’s wards study. His attempt to
colour Vande Mataram as any other song
is wrong and does not stand to the statement made by the first President of
India as above excerpt from the Constituent assembly debate shows, which places
it at an equal importance as National Anthem.
Lala Lajpat Rai ran a nationalistic Newspaper by the name
of Vande Mataram and many freedom-fighters bore the atrocities of the British
and gave their lives with this song on their lips. It was only in the aftermath
of Emergency and the later times around end of 90s and 21st
centuries that the religious issues with respect to Vande Mataram came into
being. Whether this resulted from the global rise in fanaticism or by carefully
cultivation of half-read dissent by those who were in power but found it
slipping through their fingers is a matter of serious introspection for us as a
nation.
As a matter of record, Gandhiji wrote in his article in Harijan in 1939, “No matter what its
source was and how it was composed, it had become a most powerful battle cry
among Hindus and Musalmans of Bengal during the partition days (Partition of
Bengal). It was an anti-imperialistic cry…I associated the purest national
spirit with it. It never occurred to me that it was a Hindu song or meant only
for Hindus.”
Nehru also said in 1948 in constituent Assembly debate:
It is unfortunate that some kind of argument has arisen as between Vande Mataram and Jana Gana Man. Vande
Mataram is obviously and indisputably the premier national song of India, with
great historical tradition, and intimately connected with our struggle for
freedom. That position is bound to retain and no other song can displace it.
In 1946 speech in Assam, Gandhiji even advised that Jai Hind should not displace Vande Mataram. He feared that if we started on that path, where would we stop?
All these historic perspective leaves us with only one
point, can the song be forced on people? Now this is a question which is more legal
in nature than philosophical. It should be the courts which must answer it.
After all it was Supreme Court of India which sneaked in National Anthem into
the private entertainment space of the citizens. It is really sad that SC in its other decision had to use the words- Constitution has no concept of National Song. It was a sad thing to note given the statement of President of India in Constituent assembly. If it is missing in the Constitution then it should be brought in as amendment in line with the spirit of the CA. When 42nd amendment can be done (and it stays) which being categorically refused by the CA, how come Vande Mataram is still not in the constitution?
Leaving alone the private and
public spaces, when it comes to Government bodies, events and spaces, they are
well within their right and owe the obligation to numerous freedom fighters who
fought for a free nation, which they have come about to rule and govern, to make National
song mandatory. It is absolutely hollow to render it the color of human
emancipation or link it the freedom of citizens. Why should the citizen stand
upright at the time of national anthem? And I put forth the same fear which Gandhiji expressed, " Where will we stop?"
A nation is bound by rules, and stands
on it. Rules will apply equally on strongest of its people and thus offer
structure and security to the weakest of its people. Vande Mataram should not
be forced, but the important counter-question to it is – why should there be a necessity for it
to be forced? Some go even as far as to claim that Islam does not allow bending before another anyone except God. I would only advise them to go through the court practices of Mughal. Muslim courtiers happily followed the customs of Kornish and Taslim. Akbar even introduced Sajda, which was later discontinued in Diwan-e-Aam (the common audience) but continued in Diwaan-e-Khas. No one had problem bending in front of mere mortal, while here it is motherland we speak about, which is nothing but the nature as the poet elaborates in his words, which in turn is nothing but manifestation of God. As a nation, if we do not stand for anything, we will fall for everything. This we stand for, defines our character as a nation. This national character and national pride is necessary for the well-being of a nation. We cannot forgo it.
Vande Mataram!!
Comments