Skip to main content

India, That is Bharat- Part 4- Vedic Chronolgy

(This is the 4th Part in the Series after:

Part 1- Geographical Formation of India - Read Here

Part 2- The formation of Rig Vedic India- Read Here
Part 3- The vedas - Read Here )

The Chronology of Vedic India

We now try to establish the chronology of the formation of the Vedic World. Historians lament that the Vedic Indians were terrible in keeping the records (as against the Egyptians and Greeks). The reason behind this could be a very long history before the establishment of proper monarchies wherein the Monarchs might be interesting in keeping their histories, real or invented, preserved for the posterity. Another reason could be the inherent nature of Vedic thought, which was more concerned with spiritual exploration and search, than about empire building. The affiliations of later scholars also did not help much. Christian scholars found it hard to accept a world before Genesis, which was around 4500 BC. Communist scholars, which India had post-independence, had their own agenda in deriding the history which can only be called the Hindu history of India, much to their chagrin. 

 Many contend that the Aryan History began around 1700 BC (European point of view). This is a point which is widely contested and as we dig deeper, we find it to be incorrect, derived merely because we have 900 BC as the time of Atharva-Ved and by assigning equal duration to each Veda (Max Mueller formula), we arrive at 1700-1900 BC for the Rig-Veda compilation. Now, we have two issues here. One, the history of Aryans goes beyond their first arrival into India; two, even the time estimated of their arrival into India around 1700 BC is unscientific. 

Going by amazing analytical works of Lokmanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak in to the Aryan history, which sets the dates based on the Rig-Vedic references (Cross-referenced to Persian writings) and Astronomical details in Rig-Veda, we begin reaching somewhere. He fixes the date for the compilation of Taittiriya Samhita in what is refers to as Krittika period, that is 2350 BC. Rig-veda obviously, being older, must go to somewhere around 3000 BC. What Tilak further posits is that while Rig-Veda might have been compiled around 3000 BC in India, it was written for centuries earlier as it has the references to the earlier habitat of the Aryans, that is Arctic. This thought aligns with the idea of Shri A K Majumdar

This takes into account the rule of Manu, The First, or Adima (Adam) in Uttara Kuru (Siberia or Arctic) till around 8000 BC. Some of the hymns of Rig-Veda were written during those times which refer to six-month long day and night. A devastating winter forced them to move, as they settle down in central Asia crossing Roosam (Russia) by 4000-5000 BC, before again splitting in parts and moving in various directions and some reaching India around 3000 BC. Those moving west-ward settled in Egypt and Greece. Dyaus of Aryans became Zeus in Greek, Dyauspitar (Father of the Gods) became Jupiter. Atharvans light up the sacrificial fires in India and Athravas in Iran (Ariyanna- Land of the Aryans)  to ward of chief of evil spirits, Vritra, in India and Veretra in Iran. There was huge moral fall, devastation and general lawlessness in the new Aryan settlements, considered as the beginning of Kalyug- the Age of moral decline which as per Hindu thought continues. This was around 2900 BC. Brahma at this time, disappointed, directs his sages, who were the fountainhead of intellectual morality, to go ahead, marry and take civilization forward. Essentially, he asks the sages to join the mainstream and work with the society to bring the order back. 

Around a century down, the first Monarchy will be formed, headed by Manu-II, while the Brahma of the time, had retreated back to the Uttara Kuru (Siberia), named after the illustrious leader from the Arctic days, also called Swayambhu Manu. Between 5000 to 3000 BC, the Aryans were spread across Asia, and Vairaja dynasty ruled in Central Asia, called Brahmavrata

Aryan Vairaja Dynasty (Brahmavrata, Central Asia)
[There is some dispute here. There are some who say Brahmavrata was around Bithoor, in UP, near Kanpur. However, the absolute silence of Rigveda on Ganga, makes one doubt this contention.] 

King Virat: 2950 BC to 2930 BC
Swayambhu Manu, ruled from 2930 BC- 2900 BC

Manu  and his wife, Satrupa, had two sons- Priyavrata and Uttanpada who, it is said , between two of them, ruled the seven islands of the world (Bhagwat Purana). This was probably the first example of a federal government and first reference to the seven continents. There were independent kingdoms, all ruled under the same policies and rules, with Manu Samhita as a singular constitution governing them, run independently. Even within Aryavrata (Indian State, or Jambu-Dwipa) we shall see that there were multiple kingdoms, all together as a singular entity called Aryavrata and later, Bharat-Varsha.   

He also had three daughters- Akuti, Devahuti and Prasuti. 
Devahuti was learned woman and also contributed hymns to Rig-Veda. 
Prasuti was married to the king Daksh (This is considered to be the first marriage to be solemnized), while Akuti to Sage Ruci and Devahuti to a very poor Sage Kardama who lived on the banks of Saraswati.

Sage Kardama and Devahuti had Nine daughters and a son, named Sage Kapila, who is considered to be world's first Philosopher and the founder of Sankhya philosophy. His philosophy was near atheist and believed in liberation through spiritual emancipation. He did not believe in higher Gods and Vedic sacrifices. He believed the understanding of the Self as the way to liberation.  

Priyavrata had ten sons, out of which three denounced kingdom and became Sages. Priyavrata divided his kingdom among the remaining seven as- Jambu-Dvipa (India) to the eldest Agnidhara, Plaksha (now submerged part of Africa), Salmali (Likely modern-day Somalia), Kraunch-Dweep (Australia), Saka-Dwipa (Europe), Pushkara-Dwipa (North America), Kusha-Dwipa (South America). 

Agnidhara ruled over the Indian Peninsula as Viceroy of Priyavrata from 2875 to 2850 BC. 

Agnidhara was followed by the Prince Nabhi who ruled from 2850 to 2840 BC and then handed over the reigns to son, Rishabh Dev. Rishabh Dev denounced the kingdom and became a sage in 2825 BC in search of what he called Pure Wisdom. He was later hailed as first Jain Tirthankar. 

Bharat ascended to the throne in 2825 BC. India came to be called Bharat-Varsha after him. The dynasty declined after Bharat. 

Uttanpada dynasty had 14 kings but none of them noteworthy. 

The Indo-Aryans:

The Solar Dynasty (The Surya-Vanshi)-

Under the guidance of Vishnu and under the military command of Indra, Aryans moved towards India. Marichi, the eldest of the Seven Seers, Saptarishis, who were asked by Brahma, the great Aryan Patriarch, to get into the worldly ways, had a son, Kashyap, who conquered the mountainous, Kashyap-Meru (Kashmir). He married daughter of King Daksha, of Kanakhla (Haridwar), Aditi, and had twelve sons, of which Indra, Varuna, Vivaswan and Vishnu were the most illustrious. Brahma had by then settled back in Siberia at Siddhapuri (Sidrov). Vivaswan, a poet and thinker, had a great son, Manu, who came be known as Vivaswat Manu. 

Vaivaswat Manu, ruled from 2800 BC- 2790 BC. He built the city of Ayodhya, on the banks of river Sarayu , which had Eight parts, Nine gates and and iron treasury (Atharva Veda). 

He founded solar dynasty (Suryavanshi) had 58 great kings, with names like IkshvakuPrithu, Satyavata (Trishanku), Harishchandra, Dilipa I, Bhagiratha, Sudasa, Raghu, Dasaratha and finally, the greatest of the Kings, Sri Ramchandra of Ayodhya. 

The Lunar Dynasty (The Chandra-Vanshi)-

Sage Atri, who was the second of the Seven Seers, had Som as the son. Som conquered the Central Asia and North-west India. Som begot an illicit son with Tara , the wife of Sage Vrihaspati, named Buddha. He married Ila and founded Lunar dynasty (Chandra Vanshi). This dynasty had 50 Kings and ended with Duryodhana. This was followed by Pandu dynasty with the coronation of Yudhishtira in 1388. This dynasty ended in 1372 BC. 

The sixth great king of the dynasty, Yayati (2700-2650BC), had Five sons, and each founded great dynasties. Puru, Yadu, Druyhu (Bhoja of Malwa), Truvasu (Western India, later known as Yawanas, they eventually settled in Greece) and Anu (He too went westwards and founded Mlechcha Pradesh). Around that time, a great Bharat clan King, Sudasa ruled in North-west India, over the tribe of Tritsu (some say, Sudasa was a non-Aryan king, but was supported by Indra in the battle of 10 Kings. Also we do not know if Indra as a person supported him or was he benefited in the battle due to massive rains, Indra being the rain God. It is also said that Anu drowned in the river during the battle)

He once defeated the joint army of Anu and Druhyu, and at another time and more significantly, he defeated a joint army of Ten Kings, who had stolen his Cows and were taking them across the rivers. In the first great fight of Vedic India, he killed 6000 soldiers in what is known in Rig-Veda (7th Mandala) as the Battle of Ten Kings (Dasrajnya) in which the King Puru too perished along with Janmejaya.

The Rig-Veda celebrates his victory- 

"The Tritsus in whose ranks Indra entered, went onward like downward streaming waters; their enemies leave all their goods to Sudas. Sixty hundred of Mounted Anu and Druhys perished; Sixty six heroes fell before the righteous Sudas.. The four horses of Sudas, the courser worthy of praise, richly adorned, stamping the ground, will bring race against race to glory. Ye strong Maruts, be gracious to him as to his father Divodasa, preserve him to the house of Pijavana, and let the power of the righteous king continue uninjured."

However, the great Lunar dynasty continued further, now with areas of influence settled; other great names adding to a distinguished dynasty like Dushyant, Bharat, Shantanu and Bhishm. Bhishm and Dhritrashtra were not full-kings, rather were Regents, Bhishm had opted out of it, and Dhritrashtra was not considered qualified to rule given his physical deficiency, being blind in the time when the King was also supposed to be a Military commander. 

After this volatile period of Yayati, we have Initial Aryan Kingdoms settled as:

Bharata- Upper Ganga
Yamuna (and rajasthan)- Matsyas and Yadus
Upper Yamuna and Ganga- Panchala
Eastwards from Sarayu- Koshala
East and North of Ganga- Videha
On Ganga: Kashi and Anga
South Ganga: Magadha

Magadha Empire:

From here, from this mystical, mythical world, as we move closer to the modern world, we find the Kingdoms consolidating and settling down, in the first large Monarchy of India, the Great Magadha Empire:

Brihadratha dynasty- 1304 BC- 779 BC, Starting from the reign of Brihadratha, father of Jarasandha. Brihadratha was the eldest of the Five sons of Chedi King Uparichara Vasu, who ruled somewhere around modern-day Bundelkhand. 
Pradyota Dynasty:779-665 BC (King Somapi to Ripujanya)
Sishunaga Dynasty: 665- 405 BC (10 Kings)
Nanda Dynasty: 405- 312 BC (Nanda -1 ruled for 40 Years and his Eight sons for 53 Years)
Chandragupta Maurya: 312 BC 

{Alexander arrived in 323 BC. Coronation in 312 BC gives Chandragupta time to establish and drive the Greeks out, establishing his Kingdom. Dhana Nanda ruled for 40 years and his 8 sons 53years as per Vishnu Purana. This places Nanda Dynasty establishment at 312 + 93= 405 BC. Shishu Naga dynasty had a chain of 10 Kings (Vishnu Puran), giving average of 25 years rule to each (accepted average is between 23.2 to 25 years for each king), it gives us 250+405=655 BC as the beginning of Shishu Naga Dynasty. Brihadarath dynasty had 21 Kings as per Vayu Purana, with 25 years for each king, it takes us to 25x21=525, meaning the beginning of the Magadha Empire at 779+525= 1304 BC. Max Duncker settles the foundation of Magadha in 1418 BC, while another reference takes it to 1280 BC. Both 1280 and 1308 seem correct, if we consider 1280 BC as coronation of Brihadaratha and 1308 as Coronation of Jarasandha and 1418 BC as the Coronation of Sahadev, as writer takes on or the other of the three as founder of Magadha empire.} 

After this the world becomes more plausible, and India, that is Bharat, becomes more recognizable, beyond the deliberate attempts to disfigure it made by vested interest. Keep reading. 


1. The Hindu History By A. K. Majumdar, Published, 1920
2. The Ancient History of India - By Professor Max Duncker (Translated by Evelyn Abbott), 1881
3. The Orion or Researches into The Antiquity of The Vedas- By Lokamanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak, 1893
4. The Arctic Home in The Vedas- By Lokmanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak, 1903


Popular posts from this blog

कायस्थ- इतिहास एवं वर्तमान परिपेक्ष्य

सत्यम , दानम , क्षमा शीलमानृशंस्य तपो घृणा। दृश्यंते यत्र नागेंद्र स ब्राह्मण इति स्मृतः।। ( हे सर्पराज , जिसमें सत्य , दानशीलता , क्षमा , क्रूरतारहित भाव , तप एवं संवरण , एवं संवेदना हो , वह मनुष्य को ही ब्राह्मण मानना चाहिए। ) शुद्रे तु यद् भवेल्लक्षम द्विजे तच्च न विद्दयते। न वै शूद्रों भवेच्छुद्रो ब्रह्मणो न च ब्राह्मण : ।। ( यदि शूद्र में यह गुण हैं ( सत्य , दान , अक्रोध , अहिंसा , तप , संवरण एवं संवेदना ) और ब्राह्मण में यह गुण परिलक्षित ना हों तो वह शूद्र शूद्र नहीं , ब्राह्मण है ; और वह ब्राह्मण ब्राह्मण नहीं है। )  - युधिष्ठिर - नहुष संवाद , अजगर कांड , महाभारत , वन पर्व   वर्तमान परिपेक्ष्य में जिसे जाति कहा जाता है , वह वर्ण व्यवस्था का विकृत रूप है। सनातन धर्म का वर्ण जहाँ समाज को व्यवसाय एवं क्षमता के अनुरूप व्यवस्थित करने का प्रयास था और कर्म पर आधारित था , जाति उसी व्यवस्था का विघटित रूप बन कर जन्मगत व्यवस्था बन गई। जाति या कास्ट पुर्तगाल

Pathaan and Polarisation- Movie Review

Many have not seen Pathan, I have. I have a huge tolerance towards stupid movies and I love to watch all sort of movies. What has bothered me most about Pathaan is that in terms of content and characterisation, it is absolutely shoddy, much worse than much lampooned RaOne AND there is no review which openly tells you about it.  Most reviewers have reviewed the movie like a teenager, gushing over VFX generated body of ShahRukh Khan. This reminds me of my schoolmates bunking classes to watch tomato-sauce-laced movies of Ramsey brothers, gushing over semi-nude voluptuous actresses in the late 80s. Only difference being that those were school kids in class XII, with raging hormones and a stupefied intellect when a world around them was fast changing. Here we have middle-aged professional movie reviewers guiding people to their way in or out of Movie theatres. Their primary argument in favour of the movie is nothing but beefed up Shahrukh Khan and the gap between his earlier movie and this

बाल विवाह - हिंदू इतिहास और सत्य

  इतिहास का लेखन उसकी विसंगतियों की अनुक्रमिका नहीं वरन उसके समाज के आम रूप से स्वीकृत मान्यताओं एवं उस समाज के जननायकों द्वारा स्थापित मानदंडों के आधार पर होना चाहिए। परंतु जब लेखनी उन हाथों में हो जिनका मंतव्य शोध नहीं एक समाज को लज्जित करना भर हो तो समस्या गहन हो जाती है। जब प्रबुद्ध लोग कलम उठाते हैं और इस उद्देश्य के साथ उठाते हैं कि अप्रासंगिक एवं सदर्भहीन तथ्यों के माध्यम से समाज की वर्ग विभाजक रेखाओं को पुष्ट कर सकें तो हमारा कर्तव्य होता है कि हम सत्य को संदर्भ दें और अपने इतिहास के भले बुरे पक्षों को निर्विकार भाव से जाँचें।   बीते सप्ताह बाल विवाह को लेकर विदेशी सभ्यता में उठे प्रश्नों को भारत की सभ्यता पर प्रक्षेपित करके और उसकी स्वीकार्यता स्थापित करने पर बड़ी चर्चा रही। इस संदर्भ में   श्री ए एल बाशम से ले कर राजा राम मोहन रॉय तक चर्चा चली। बाशम की पुस्तक द वंडर दैट वाज इंडिया - को उद्धृत कर ले कहा गया कि हिं