Skip to main content

India, That is Bharat-5: The Making of BharatVarsha

The Making of Bharat

उत्तरम यत्समुद्रस्य, हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम। 
वर्ष तद्वारातम नाम भारती सन्तति। - विष्णु पुराण 

"The land which lies north of the Oceans, and on the South of the Snow-peaked Mountains, there live the descendants of Bharat, after whom the land shall be named." Vishnu Purana

There has been an agenda in the Independent India to prove that India did not exist as an entity before the British or the Mughals landed, depending on whether the Historian owes allegiance to  Madarassa or to Macaulay. There are facts and references spread out and people like us who spend large part of our non-entitled lives chasing the middle-class dream of career and life, depend on their interpretation and inference to learn our history. Once we know our History, we understand our unifying and common origin. It then becomes difficult for those wanting to draw wedge between us, to do that. It also makes them difficult to continue their intellectual hegemony over the people who have discovered their shared, historic pride. While we admit that History is all about interpretation of facts by the Historian who is writing it. Still, there is a point beyond which interpretation becomes lie and lies become propaganda.

                Let us look at facts, understand them, before political thinkers posing as historians throw them out, calling them Hindutva agenda. Once they sit on the Pulpit and wag their accusing fingers at our unsure steps into the abandoned study of glorious past of our nation; we, oftentimes, humiliated, shrink to our dull, un-glamorous corners, ceding the space to them for their uninterrupted agenda. Therefore we must learn. We must learn that even when there was various kings, they all ruled almost like a federal structure under the unifying name of Sanatana. The shloka mentioned above is from Vishnu Purana. There are varied thoughts of the time when Vishnu Purana was written. Like most ancient literature of India, Puranas too passed across generations as a part of oral tradition. This makes the assessment of Chronology difficult. Also Historians lament the lack of dates and names in Indian ancient history. That is because it dates back to a time when individuals were not as important as the ideas they represented. When Swayambhu Manu, the first monarch of the Aryans divided his kingdom in Seven Parts, even as absolute rulers of their realms, they were tied into one under the same faith, practices and laws of Manu.  

                  Let us not let this deter us. Still in various mythological works from centuries before the Christ have enough indications which can help us reconstruct the history, if we have interest and integrity to rebuild our past honestly. Considering the above references to India in Vishnu Purana, let us look at the historic timeline. British Civil Servant from the Initial days of Indian Colonization, Vincent Arthur Smith places the time of compilation of Vishnu Purana somewhere between 400 to 300 BC. The earliest date attributed to the composition of Vishnu Purana is 800 BC and the latest date seems to come from Wendy Doniger who pegs it at 450 AD. Even if we take it as Doniger's 450 AD, let us accept that it was before Prophet Mohammad and Advent of Islam. That it was composed much before RSS came into being is anyways settled. The dates further prove that this was not written with a view of creating a Hindutva view of one India from the mighty Himalayas to the Oceans in the south to counter the Muslim view, British view or Periyar view.  

           While the hymn above explains the expanse of India, Vishnu Purana also explains the naming of the country. We often believe it to be named after Bharat, who was son of Dushyant the Kuru king. However, that Bharat came much later in the chronology, and he ruled one of the kingdoms under BharatVarsha (Modern day equivalent to India extending way up in North and West, where Uttara Kuru and Kekeya Kingdoms came into being). I would even hazard a guess that it went beyond Persia as Vishnu Purana refers to Yavans (The Greeks) on the Western Borders and it also explains the central location of Mount Sumeru (in modern day Garhwal)  in the overall expanse of Aryavrata over which Manu ruled. 

Priyavrata, the son of Swayambhu Manu, assigned Jambudweep (Southern Asia) to his eldest son, Agnidhra. Agnidhra gave the area south of Himalaya, Himvarsha to the eldest son Nabhi. Rishabhdev (also the first Jain Tirthankar) ruled over Himvarsha and later chose his eldest son, Bharat as his successor. Bharat, the great king, expanded the kingdom unto the oceans. This part of land was then called Bharat Varsha (even when we had independent kingdoms in Kashi, Magadha, Anga, Kuru, Kaushala,  Vaideha and Kalinga). Under the flag of Vedas, it had extended relationships to Tibet (Kimpurushvarsha- between Sumeru and Dhaval (Dhaulagiri) Mountain), Kekeya and Uttara Kuru (The son of Drum, king of Kimpurusha did attend the coronation of Yudhishtira in another ancient book of Mahabharata, also how one book from the vedic literature connects with another, authenticates the history written in these books). There is a clear consistency in description. I have verified between Rigveda, Mahabharatsa and VishnuPurana; Sir Alexander Cunningham's The Ancient Geography of India further includes Vayu Puran, Matsaya Purana, Markandaya Purana and Brahmanda Purana, each naming identical kingdoms and places and dividing India in Nine parts.  

Vishu Purana mentions the naming of Bharata

 ततश्च भारतम  वर्षमे तल्लो केषु  गीयते 
 भरताय  यत :    पित्र ा  दत्तं  प्रतिष्ठता  वनम। 

"When retiring to the Vanaprastha (Vedic practice of retiring to the pursuit of knowledge in the old age, away from the material world), Rishabh Dev, the father, annointed Bharat as his successor, so the kingdom came to be known as BharatVarsha)"

नव योजनसहस्त्र ो  विस्तारोस्य  महामुने 
कर्मभुमिरियं  स्वर्गांपवर्ग  च  गच्छताम। 

Bharat has an expanse of 9000 Yojana, this land is the arena of all the action, and this is heaven. (1 Yojana= 9.09 Miles or 14.63 Kms). 

Bharat had seven principle mountains. We have some idea of these mountains as either the name of the mountain itself or the rivers originating from them carries to this day making the inferences possible. The mountains described are Mahendra, Malaya, Sahya, Shaktiman, Riksh, Vindhya, Pariyatra. Mahendra is in the East, at Bhagalpur (in modern day Bihar). We are able to identify these mountains from the rivers originating from them. Here are the rivers mentioned in the Vishnu Purana. 

शतदृचंद्रभागा  हिमवत्पादनिर्गता 
वेदस्मृतिमुखाद्याश्च  पारियात्रो द्ध वा। 

"River Shatadru (Satluj) Chandrabhaga (Chenab) flows from the Himalaya, Periyatra Mountain (named Sanapada by Krishna, now called Western Satpura) source of Veda and Smriti...

नर्मदा सुरसाद्याश्च  नद्यो  विन्ध्यादिनिर्गता :
तपिपयोष्ण ी निरविन्ध्यप्रमुखा  ऋक्षसंभवा : 

"River Narmada and Sursa (disappeared), originates from Vindhya, Tapi and Payoshni  (now Purna) emerges from Riksh (East Satpura), 

गोदावरी , भीमरथी कृष्णवेण्यादिकास्तथा 
सह्यपदोध्वा  नद्य : स्मृता : पापभयपयहया। 

"From the Sahya (Sahyadri on Western Ghats -Mahabaleshwar) Mountains arise the holy rivers of Godavari, Bhimrathi and Krishnaveni." 

कृतमाला ताम्रपर्णीप्रमुखा मालयोद्वा 
त्रिसामा चार्यकुल्याद्या महेन्द्रप्रभावा: स्मृता: ।  

"River Kritmala (Now disappeared but traced near Madurai, Kiruthumal river, originating from Nagamalai Hills) and Tamraparni (originating from Pothigai Hills also known as Agastya Malai),  Trisama (Now Tribhanga) and Aryakulya (Now Rushikulya originating from Daringbadi hills) arising from MahendraGiri (in Odisha), 

This here covers the mountains of Eastern Ghat, Western Ghat and even down south at Madurai. Thus we understand the vast expanse of Bharatvarsha. Malay Parvat that we locate in the south is where Vedic sage Agastya wrote the first Tamil Grammar, at the source of river Tamraparni, where he went expanding Vedic wisdom.  Agastyamalai standing between TamilNadu and Kerala, must have extended to Madurai and finds reference in Mahabharata too. 

Political expediency has pushed people to manufacture history which divides us. Therefore, we need to go back to the time when the current political expediency did not exist. Let us remember once again, the India, that is one; India, That is Bharat. 
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bahubali 2- The Conclusion- Movie Review

We are living in an extremely cause-heavy world where causes - real and imagined cloud our minds. I saw this in the case of the movie - Beauty and The Beast. There the quarrel of the social commentators was that it explored the gay angle of one of the characters only briefly, only fleetingly. There can be nothing more absurd than that. You are demanding more from an artist than possibly he can offer. Art is a profession of lonely persuasion, and it serves the purpose its creator desires it to serve. Nothing more and nothing less. It is sad and unfortunates that the liberals, which in Indian context largely translates to Leftists, insists that art is nothing but a vehicle that should be provided to them for their political agendas and narratives to ride on. It is like insisting that the reference to the Negroes in the "The Great Gatsby" should have been expanded to cover racism in detail. The brief episode was merely to substantiate the character and nothing more. Just as cre…

Resurrecting Hinduism- Without Embarrassment

I have been pondering about the sense of despondency, the sense of shame which has been imposed on the Hindu thoughts in Indian society. Every act of faith has to be explained, justified. When partition happened, Muslims fought and obtained an independent Nation, while the other large chunk of population, which, in spite of numerical supremacy, was subjugated for centuries, got India. In line with inherent openness and flexibility of Hinduism, India became a secular nation. This is a matter of pride, since it acknowledged the basic secular nature of Sanatan Dharm. However, as things would evolve, vested political interests considered India as unfinished agenda standing in the path of a religious empire being built world-wide. Through a well-calculated intellectual conspiracy of neglect and vilification, it came to a stage that modern Hindus where embarrassed of their religion and apologetic of their faith. This neglect also resulted in the religion being left to the guardianship of un…

Women in Vedas - The Fake Story of Sati Pratha

Biggest problem which Hinduism faces when it is being evaluated through the western prism of Abrahamic faith . I was watching a speech by Sadhguru where he mentioned a very critical defining feature of Hinduism. He says, unlike Western faiths, Hinduism did not place anyone at a pedestal where questions would not reach. Forget the Prophets and Masters, even Gods were received with affection and a list of questions. Nothing was ever beyond debate in Hinduism, not even Gods. This very nature of Hinduism has often been cause of concern and confusion for Western thinkers, troubled by a religion, which is seeped so deep into our culture of exploration of truth through investigation and examination. When the western scholars approach the Vedic Indian wisdom, oftentimes their approach itself is based on the assumption that they are approaching a civilization, a religion which is inferior to theirs. This makes it hard for them to accept a society which was an intellectually flourishing society…